EVISA Print | Glossary on | Contact EVISA | Sitemap | Home   
 Advanced search
The establishment of EVISA is funded by the EU through the Fifth Framework Programme (G7RT- CT- 2002- 05112).


Supporters of EVISA includes:

Standard Methods for the Determination of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

(11.03.2025)


Recent changes in PFAS regulations reflect growing global concern over their environmental and health impacts:
  1. United States: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has introduced legally enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for six PFAS in drinking water. For example, PFOA and PFOS are now limited to 4 parts per trillion (ppt), while other compounds like PFHxS and PFNA have stricter limits
  2. European Union: The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is evaluating a proposal to impose sweeping restrictions on over 10,000 PFAS compounds across all sectors. This includes stricter controls on their use in products like textiles, cosmetics, and food packaging.
  3. Canada: Health Canada has issued new objectives for PFAS in drinking water, aiming to set maximum levels for certain compounds. This interim measure addresses health concerns while more comprehensive guidelines are being developed.
These changes highlight a global trend toward stricter monitoring, testing, and restrictions on PFAS to mitigate their risks.

Using standard methods for PFAS analysis is essential for several reasons:

1. Accuracy and Reliability
  • Standard methods (like EPA, ASTM, and ISO) are scientifically validated and peer-reviewed, ensuring the results are accurate and reproducible.
  • They outline strict protocols for sample collection, preparation, and analysis, reducing the risk of contamination or errors.

2. Comparability of Data
  • Using standardized techniques means results from different labs or studies can be directly compared.
  • This is crucial for regulatory monitoring, trend analysis, and collaborative research since consistency allows for meaningful comparisons.

3. Regulatory Compliance
  • Many governments and agencies (like the U.S. EPA or European Environment Agency) require adherence to specific methods for PFAS testing.
  • Non-compliance can result in legal penalties or rejection of test results for environmental permits, site assessments, or public health studies.

4. Detection of a Broad Range of PFAS
  • These methods cover a wide variety of PFAS compounds — both long-chain and short-chain — ensuring no major contaminants are overlooked.
  • Advanced methods like EPA Draft Method 1633 even include emerging PFAS compounds, keeping up with evolving science.

5. Sensitivity and Specificity

  • PFAS are often present at ultra-trace levels (parts per trillion, ppt), so methods like LC-MS/MS specified in these standards offer the sensitivity needed for accurate detection.
  • They also help distinguish between different PFAS species, preventing false positives or inaccurate quantification.

6. Legal and Scientific Credibility
  • Standardized methods add credibility to lab reports, making them more likely to be accepted in court cases, regulatory filings, and scientific publications.
  • They build trust with stakeholders — whether it’s regulators, companies, or the public.

7. Quality Assurance and Control (QA/QC)
  • These methods include strict QA/QC procedures — like using blank samples, matrix spikes, and surrogate standards — ensuring the data quality is high.
  • This helps identify and correct for any contamination or loss during the sampling and analysis process.

Michael Sperling

The following standard methods are available:


 


International Standard Methods




ASTM Methods:

    ASTM D7968-23

    ASTM D7979-20
    ASTM D8421-22

ISO Methods:

    ISO 21675:2019
  • Focus: PFAS in drinking water using solid-phase extraction and LC-MS/MS.
  • Technique: Solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (Lc-MS/MS)
  • Note: Provides an internationally recognized framework for PFAS analysis.
  • Link: https://www.iso.org/standard/71338.html

    ISO 23702-1:2023


 


US American PFAS Testing Methods


EPA Methods:

    EPA Method 533 

    EPA Method 537

    EPA Method 537.1

    EPA Method 8327

    EPA Method 1633A (latest development)

    Other Test Method (OTM)-45

    Other Test Method (OTM)-50

    EPA Rule UCMR 5


U.S. Department of Agriculture: Chemistry Laboratory Guidebook (USDA CLG):

    USDA CLG-PFAS 2.04
  • Focus: Analysis of 16 PFAS in bovine, porcine, poultry, Siluriformes muscle samples, and in bovine plasma samples.
  • Technique: Methanol-based protein precipitation extraction followed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis on a C18 column.
  • Note: The method is performance based and allows equivalent equipment, reagents, or solutions to be used, and some instrument parameters can be optimized as detailed in the method to improve chromatography and detection.
  • Link: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/documents/CLG-PFAS2.04.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Laboratory Procedures

    CDC 6304.09
  • Focus: 15 PFAS Analysis for Serum
  • Technique: online solid-phase extraction follwed by  turbo ion spray LC-MS/MS analysis
  • Note: PFOS is analyzed separately as n-perfluorooctane sulfonate (n-PFOS) and the sum of perfluoromethylheptane sulfonate isomers (sm-PFOS). Similarly, PFOA is analyzed as separately as n-perfluorooctanoate (n-PFOA) and the sum of branched perfluorooctanoate isomers (sb-PFOA).
  • Link: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/public/2019/labmethods/PFAS-K-Met-508.pdf

U.S. Food & Drug Adminstration (FDA): Foods Program Compendium of Analytical Methods

    FDA C-010.03
  • Focus:  Determination of 30 PFAS in Food and Feed
  • Technique: QuEChERS, filtration, solid-phase extraction followed by LC-MS/MS analysis on a C18 column
  • Note:  The method also uses LC-HRMS for verification of PFBA and PFPeA detection in order to address the potential for false positives due to matrix interferences since these compounds each have only one MS/MS transition.
  • Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/131510/download



 


European PFAS Testing Methods:



EN Methods:

EN 17681-1

EN 17681-2

EN 17892:2024

 


German PFAS Testing Methods



DIN Methods:

   
    DIN 38407-42 (F42)
  • Focus: Determination of selected polyfluorinated compounds (PFAS) in drinking water, groundwater, surface water and treated waste water
  • Technique: High performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection (HPLC/MS-MS) after solid-liquid extraction
  • Note: Investigating bodies/laboratories mostly cite a quantitication limit in soil eluates of 5 to 10 ng/l for single compounds; in some cases quantitication limits of 1 ng/l are achievable.
  • Link: https://www.dinmedia.de/de/norm/din-38407-42/137282966

    DIN 38414-14 (S14)
  • Focus: Determination of selected polyfluorinated compounds (PFAS) in sludge, compost and soil 
  • Technique: High performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection (HPLC-MS/MS)
  • Note: The method’s lower limit of quantitation and detection is given as 10 μg/kg. Quantitication limits for individual substances currently range from 1 to 10 μg/kg, and 0.1 μg/kg in exceptional cases. A lower limit of quantitation and detection of 0.1 μg/kg is required to determine the background contamination of soils (ubiquitous contamination).
  • Link: https://www.dinmedia.de/de/norm/din-38414-14/142612398

 


French PFAS Testing Methods




    AFNOR XP X43-126



Related Information


This website is informing about available standards and standard mixtures for the calibration of methods.



These guidelines inform about all aspects of German standard methods for PFAS analysis.

EPA: PFAS Analytical Methods Development and Sampling Research

This site informs about all aspects of US EPA standard methods for PFAS analysis



This website is informing about available standards and standard mixtures for the calibration of methods.





Comments






Imprint     Disclaimer

© 2003 - 2025 by European Virtual Institute for Speciation Analysis ( EVISA )